Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP SD Billing
Viewing all 6807 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Calculating a billing cycle time

June 9, 2016, 4:03 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I have been tasked with calculating the billing cycle for organisation. Basically what I want to calculate is the time it took to generate an invoice, from the proposed billing date to the actual date the invoice was generated.

 

So I want to figure out the time it hits the VF04 bill due list ready to bill to the actual date the invoice is created.

 

I am wondering is there any tables that will give me this information?

 

Thanks for your help and sorry I cannot be any clearer.

 

Thanks you,

Gary.

↧
Search

Re: RVIVAUFT: Cannot generate intercompany billing document

June 9, 2016, 4:34 am
$
0
0

Hi,

for processing log please check v.24 or try to get help from ABAP'er.

 

BR

↧
↧

Re: Calculating a billing cycle time

June 9, 2016, 5:52 am
$
0
0

Hi Gary,

LIKP-FKDAT is the proposed billing date for deliveries. For order-related billing documents, you can check VBKD-FKDAT.

Billing date for billing documents i stored in VBRK-FKDAT. By comparing these fields, you can get the difference in days.

↧

Re: Sales Distribution SD Module User Exit - Past Due Credit

June 9, 2016, 11:12 am
$
0
0

Thank you, it seems very clear to me and straightforward.

↧

Idoc error..Requested function cannot be executed - Contact your system administrator..Message no. HUGENERAL099

June 10, 2016, 4:33 am
$
0
0

Hi

 

We have some inbound idoc for which are getting error as below

 

Requested function cannot be executed - Contact your system administrator

Message no. HUGENERAL099

 

 

only 51 status is showing

 

please assist

51 error.jpg

 

Thanks and regards

Sachin K

↧
↧

Re: Cancellation of cancelled invoice (SAP note 388489)

June 10, 2016, 6:52 am
$
0
0


F2 100

S1  101

S2 102

 


I have cancelled the S1 invoice using S2 invoice as mentioned in the thread.

 


But My question what will happened to F2 invoice.


 

1. We cannot cancel the F2 invoice since it is already cancellation state.

2. How to reverse the accounting entry made by F2 invoice.


 

The whole issue is occurred because our business user has cancelled the invoice using item selection options in VF11 tcode and therefore there  is no check mark in the cancelled field of the F2 invoice.

 

The user just want to cancel the F2 invoice in-order to re-bill it again.

 



Please advise how to handle this situations.

↧

ADD New Column in output of TA:- V.23

June 10, 2016, 7:28 am
$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

I have one requirement to add billing date column in V.23(Release sales order for billing) transaction output.

 

So, this is to be done in some Exit of V.23 program and have to append standard structure?

 

Could you please provide the EXIT name and structure name where we have to add billing date field.

 

Thanks for the help.

 

Regards,

Ashish Arora

↧

Re: ADD New Column in output of TA:- V.23

June 11, 2016, 2:29 am
$
0
0

Hi,

Ask your Abaper to include the Extra fields in

  • VBMTVZ (Customer enhancements for lists of sales documents)

by using

  • V05TZZMO (further document fields for lists of sales documents)
↧
Search

rebates from 2 agreements for the same condition

June 11, 2016, 1:39 pm
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

i am facing an issue. I am trying to create 2 rebate agreements 205, 206, with different agreement type Z001 , Z002 and assigned with same condition group.

for both agreement i entered the condition record with the same access ( Sales Org / Distr.chnl / shipto / plant )

thus I got the following result in the billing document ( condition tab on item )

condition ZB12 was found twice with different agreements.

 

 

 

Example 2

this time i create the third agreement 207 with condition records with different access sequence ( Sales org / Distr.chl/ shipto ) which is after the previous, the result is : this agreement with the price can not be found.

 

 

Question:

1. Is it possible to let 2 different agreements working for the same condition record e.g. ZB12 but with different access sequence ?

2. I have tried with different agreement type and same agreement type, it seems has nothing to do with agreement type, the only essential criteria is, whether the condition record is created with the same access sequence or not. Is that correct ?

 

By the way I have checked the thread, however found nothing ...

 

Two rebate agreements for the same invoice?

can anyone help me out ?

 

 

thanks!!!

 

Reck

↧
↧

Two Line Items with Price and Discount/Surcharge

June 13, 2016, 1:11 am
$
0
0

Dear Gurus,

 

My client is in a transportation business, they offer vehicles for petrochemical products to customers.

 

Like having two line item at order level.

 

1. Vehicle (Service material)

2. Condensate (Non valuated material)

 

in want both material should appear at billing level as well.

 

For customer client offer price base on Material, so our condition type for price ZBPR (Price x Qty) based on material. (Condensate)

 

For discount/surcharge client offer it on vehicles, so we develop the condition type ZDIS (discoutn/surchare x Qty) based on material. (vehicles)

 

but when enter both materials at order level and enter all the relevant price, system give the "Incompletion Log" Net value missing for material "Vehicle" as there is no price in it, only the discount.

 

Please suggest how should I can tackle this situation so that system will not ask for the price at this material.

 

If i enter all the price into one material that is a option but, in material "vehicle" some factor based on condensate, and vise versa, so i can't do that.

 

Looking for the gurus feedback.

 

reards,

 

imran khan

↧

Re: rebates from 2 agreements for the same condition

June 13, 2016, 9:25 am
$
0
0

Recke,

In a billing document, two rebate condition types can be determined even if these have different access sequence (or have the same access sequence).

In your message - Access has  not been executed due to previous access

Access here is condition table and not access sequence.

 

Search in google with this error message and you will get lots of information and then try to apply that to your test cases.

TW

 

Note: Do your rebate access sequences have exclusive indicator activated?

↧

Re: rebates from 2 agreements for the same condition

June 13, 2016, 9:29 am
$
0
0

hi, Typerwriter,

 

to your question in Note: ---- yes there is exclusive indicator, and that is also the reason why only one can be found. the other access will not be continoue searched ( yes with message Access has  not been executed due to previous access) .

 

but we need this exlusion indicator. .... Is this what you mean in ur last reply ?

 

 

Reck

↧

Re: rebates from 2 agreements for the same condition

June 13, 2016, 9:53 am
$
0
0

Recke,

In our conversations, we should be very clear and not interchange access and access sequence

 

In a access sequence several accesses (condition tables) be maintained. And your access sequence has exclusive indicator activated. So once valid condition record for REB1 is found it will not go down to the remaining condition tables, so REB2 will not be found, even though a match condition record exists (match of condition record with information in the billing document).

(as you have also commented)

 

Yes, in this design (exclusive indicator activated) you need different access sequences, so that both rebate condition types are found.

TW

 


↧
↧

Re: Specifying Rebate limit

June 13, 2016, 9:59 am
↧

Re: rebates from 2 agreements for the same condition

June 13, 2016, 10:05 am
$
0
0

thus we now considering the solution by creating different condition type for different agreement( types ),

one type with one customer we can only have one agreement

and we would take out the exclusion indicator in the access seqence

 

then we can have different access in different agreements.

 

alternative I can not find any better solutions.

 

what do you think ?

 

Regards

Reck

↧
Search

Re: rebates from 2 agreements for the same condition

June 13, 2016, 10:12 am
$
0
0

Recke,

In your previous post

but we need this exlusion indicator.

Are you saying you will remove the exclusive indicator assigned in the access sequence? Or NOT?

Please confirm this. Is the above an option for your client?

TW

↧

Re: rebates from 2 agreements for the same condition

June 13, 2016, 10:20 am
$
0
0

this is what I can think of,

if there is no other option, then we can only try to sell this option mentioned above ( without exclusion indicator ) to the user, and rebuilt all the condition record.

In addition, the user need to pay attention that no more than one rebate agreement with one customer can be created.

 

it is not what we want at the beginning, thats why I made this question here

↧
↧

Re: rebates from 2 agreements for the same condition

June 13, 2016, 10:35 am
$
0
0

Recke,

The reason why your third agreement 207 does not get any accruals from this (same) billing document is because the access (condition table) for this is not processed by the system because system stops once it finds the access (condition table) for 205 and 206.

The above is happening because of the exclusion indicator in your access sequence.

 

For SP you can use the same access sequence, no change in this.

For the store you can create a new access sequence with only access (condition table) as sales org/dis channel/ material.

 

Both will have different condition types and different access sequence. By this all the rebate agreements will find accrual value from the same billing document.

TW

↧

Re: rebates from 2 agreements for the same condition

June 14, 2016, 12:08 am
$
0
0

Hi TW Typerwriter,

 

yes this is the approach we are going to taken, maybe we would use same access sequence for these 2 condition types . But we would take out the exclusion indicator in access sequence.

 

 

thanks for the help !

 

Regards

Recke

↧

Condition Type in KM (Kilometer)

June 14, 2016, 1:11 am
$
0
0

Dear Gurus,

 

My client is in service business, give the transportation services, deliverable material via vehicle is a service material; lets say "Condensate"

 

I have two conditions, 1 is for price and 2nd one is for surcharge in KM.

 

Condensate Qty 10 Ltr is multiply with the price, let say $ 100/Ltr = so condition value is $1000.

after this I have a fix KM based on customer, let say for the above customer its 500 KM, so now 500 is multiply with $1000 again and calculate the final price value.

 

for the multiplication i can create a ABAP routine which multiply the condition value of first condition type with second condition type for KM. total result will be fine.

 

my question how i can create the 2nd condition type to enter the total kilometer let say 500 km.

 

looking for the gurus response.

 

regards,

↧
Viewing all 6807 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>