Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP SD Billing
Viewing all 6807 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Re: Specifying Rebate limit

June 14, 2016, 3:54 am
$
0
0

Hi TW,

 

I tired automatic settlement and it created a credit memo with ZERO value. That part is correct as you mentioned.

 

But if the theory is correct and if that is captured in SAP then there has to be some place where we mention the "AGREED SALES VALUE / VOLUME" for which the rebate agreement is made.

 

Till now from all the responses which I have got, I believe that my main point is not being understood.

 

As per Glynn C. Williams

 

"This discount is based on the sales volume for the customer over a specific time period. The rebate is only relevant if the customer purchases the required sales volume."


All the theory says that rebate / retroactive discount is ONLY relevant if the customer purchases the REQUIRED SALES VOLUME. 


If SAP is following the theory completely then there has to be some place where we can specify the  REQUIRED SALES VOLUME. 

↧
Search

Re: Condition Type in KM (Kilometer)

June 14, 2016, 9:07 am
$
0
0

You have been posting various queries in SCN, getting inputs from members but unfortunately, you have neither expressed some courtesy for who had responded nor closed the thread.  As of now, around 100 open threads are there created by you which is not fair on your part.

 

Please respect others' time, have self-discipline and see that you close threads wherever your requirement / issue gets addressed. 

 

 

G. Lakshmipathi

↧
↧

Billing split for Third party sales order after Miro

June 15, 2016, 12:30 am
$
0
0

Hi Guys,

 

I have one scenario in which there are two items in sales order

 

1. Third Party sales item

2. Normal item.

 

 

Both above items have order related billing.

 

When I create sales order then PR is generated for the first item, for which PO and MIRO is done.

 

After MIRO, Billing date of 1st item changes to MIRO date, But for second item it doesn't change.

 

Due to this Two line items appear in billing due list.

 

Is there any enhancement or exit in MIRO so that We can update billing date of all items together in sales order.

 

 

Regards,

 

Nile

↧

Re: Wrong VAT calculation

June 15, 2016, 1:30 am
$
0
0

It is very clear due to the price unit issue.

the first one is = 83 per 100 qty

 

and 20 % is the tax

the 83*.2 = 16.6

then for per unit

16.6/100 = .166  (here it is getting rounding off)

rounded off to two digit 0.17

and hence for 100 pcs 0.17*100

 

In the second scenario it is .83

 

here it is direct and hence

the unit value is 0.83

so

and 20 % is the tax

the 0.83*.2 = 0.166

but as a final value system picks two digits and makes it 0.16

better apply rounding off rule in the final subtotal , so the issue shall resolve , even if any round off issue come it wont be greater than -0.4 to +0.4 for a innvoice

 

 

 

This is a logical conclusion , since understanding is based on screen shot presented

↧

Re: Billing Enhancement to change Sales Order

June 15, 2016, 4:48 am
$
0
0

Alejandra, No misunderstanding here, I got your point. While cancelling the billing document, you are probably going to be locking the sales order of the billing document as well - that's why I told you to check if the lock mechanism moves in. Because you'll probably want to use a bapi to update the sales order in the user exit, and as the sales order is locked, you'll not be able to change it. That's why I've recommended to check the lock on sales document to see whether you can use a user exit or not.

↧
↧

Re: Problem in fetching proper taxes in Rebate settlement document

June 15, 2016, 4:50 am
$
0
0

As you said, the credit memo is created with some zee functionality, you have to check as to why system is fetching different partner functions.  Ideally, all data in parent document should be unique in source document also.  Nevertheless, tax will be calculated at item level, whatever be the SH at item level, tax would be calculated based on this region only

 

 

G. Lakshmipathi

↧

Re: Problem in fetching proper taxes in Rebate settlement document

June 15, 2016, 5:27 am
$
0
0

G. Lakshmipathi,


Thanks for response .


But if we consider item level of Invoice and Credit memo request , both are same but still taxes are not properly determined


↧

Re: Problem in fetching proper taxes in Rebate settlement document

June 15, 2016, 6:01 am
$
0
0

Sorry your explanation is not enough to understand what exactly your issue is as long as screen shot is shared.  Moreover, as already communicated, it seems the zee program is creating this issue.  To reconfirm this, try to create manually via VA01 with reference to that billing document and check how system is fetching the tax data

 

 

G. Lakshmipathi

↧
Search

New Partner Function in Condition Table

June 15, 2016, 11:06 pm
$
0
0

Dear Gurus,

 

I have created a new partner function and create as a customer and assign it in the partner function tab of another main customer, at the time of sales order system ask for the all the alternates via a pop up message.

 

I want to maintain the condition table based on this partner function, but only SP, SH, BP and PY are available, if I choose condition table let say "customer number" system basically search for the sold to party.

 

Please confirm how i will incorporate this new partner function in the condition table, as few of my price are based on this, with thanks.

 

regards,

↧
↧

Re: Condition Type in KM (Kilometer)

June 15, 2016, 11:09 pm
$
0
0

Dear G Lakshmipathi,

 

Thanks for the direction, I will follow, soon you will found the corrective action, with thanks.

 

regards,

 

imran khan

↧

Price Group based on Ship to Party

June 16, 2016, 12:06 am
$
0
0

Dear Gurus,

 

I have a condition table

 

Ship to party + Price Group

 

In sold to party I have so many ship to party, but when creating the order I choose the correct ship to party, system can not determine the "Price Group" based on ship to party ???? please confirm why this is the behavior. I have to choose it manually at the header level but need automatically.

 

but in certain cases where all partner function are the same, system automatically determine the "Price Group" based on the sold to party, as it is maintain in the customer master data of the sold to party.

 

Looking for the gurus feedback.

 

regards,

↧

Re: New Partner Function in Condition Table

June 16, 2016, 12:18 am
$
0
0

Hi,

Discuss with your ABAP ér to include the "PARVW" - Partner Function into the Pricing Tables KOMG/ KOMK or KOMK.

 

 

Regards,

SRK

↧

Re: Price Group based on Ship to Party

June 16, 2016, 12:43 am
$
0
0

Hi,

Discuss with your ABAP'er to include Ship - to - Party - VKGRP in User Exit- MV45AFZZ through USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBKD .

 

 

Regards,

SRK

↧
↧

Re: Query on Invoice List

June 16, 2016, 1:55 am
$
0
0

Hi,

I looked into the requirement type 62 and found that it also checks for invoice list and if customer is selected/configured for invoice list it wont default output type.

Now I have another issue, I am not able to see output for items in invoice list, can anyone have idea how to print invoice list items individually.

 

regards

Ashutosh

↧

Re: Billing - update ZZKZWI sub-total after accounting document created

June 15, 2016, 4:00 am
$
0
0

Since the values are already posted in FI, I don't think, even with the zee program, your requirement can be met.  May be you can explore Retro Billing functionality only for that condition type.

 

 

G. Lakshmipathi

↧
Search

Re: Billing Enhancement to change Sales Order

June 15, 2016, 4:04 am
$
0
0

Alejandra,

Please test this scenario in this system: Go to VF11, enter billing document number, do not save. In a separate session, go to VA02, enter your order number, and see if you can change the order right now. If the system says that order is being locked, than you cannot change this sales order in a billing user exit whilst reversing billing document. You'd have to create, say, an output condition type which is triggered after billing reversal, and changes the sales document according to your requirement.

↧

Problem in fetching proper taxes in Rebate settlement document

June 15, 2016, 4:44 am
$
0
0

Hello ,

 

I am facing one issue in taxes please find details below -

 

I have invoice document with rebate settlement condition . In invoice sold-to party and ship-to party are different ( and country of both of them are different).

 

Based on this invoice rebate settlement document is created ( kind of Credit memo request using some Z functionality).

While creating this credit memo request document ship-to-party from Invoice Item is correctly copied to Credit memo request item .

But while passing ship-to-party at header level it is referring to Sold-to-party of invoice.

 

But now in this document taxes are different than in invoice.

 

So while creating Credit memo request , if I pass ship-to-party from item level of invoice to ship-to-party of Credit memo request header ship-to party will it work for determining taxes correctly ? what are the implications ?

 

Thanks ,Prasad

↧
↧

Re: Billing Enhancement to change Sales Order

June 15, 2016, 4:11 am
$
0
0

Hi Kivanc,

Thank you for your answer. Unfortunatelly there is a misunderstanding. I don't mean to execute transaction VA02 while executing in another session VF11. What I am trying to find is an enhancement to modify the billing block of the Sales Order from VF11 execution.

↧

Re: Specifying Rebate limit

June 17, 2016, 4:00 am
$
0
0

Hi Vishal,

 

Please, check the following notes

 

SAP Note 75778 - Consulting/troubleshooting for rebate processing

SAP Note 456458 - FAQ: How does SDBONT06 work?

SAP Note 410579 - FAQ: Rebate processing

SAP Note 105681 - Consulting: New rebate procedure

 

and related notes.

 

In the other hand, I believe you have a little confussion related with accruals. The purpose of  accruals in accounting is to share the cost in all FI periods instead in the FI period when the settlement is run. Obviously the percentage of accrual is an expected percentage. For instance, if your agreement is with an scale for 4, 6 and 8%, maybe your more reasonable expected percentage is the average, then the 6%. The excess or deficit of accrual would be made in FI by SAP.

 

For instance, for the pricing procedure RVAA01 the condition BO02 the accrual acc. key is ERU. So, in tcode VKOA you must have an entry, one for G/L account and other for the accrual.

 

So, in tcode VBO1, in conditions you'd have to see the accruals, and no the amount because you'd have a scale as other colleague mentioned. If you click on scales, you can see one entry for zero and other for 2%. Obviously the value for accrual is related with the expected value (the salesman, the CFO,..).

 

I hope it helps you

 

Regards

 

Eduardo

↧

Error when posting invoice to accounting

June 17, 2016, 4:34 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

we are running some tests and have come across the following error when trying to post an invoice to accounting. Has anyone see this error before?

 

"No value assigned to characteristic Outlet not valid in current year"

↧
Viewing all 6807 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>