yes we use cust.Hierarchy and ztable for maintaining these texts
↧
Re: POPUP at delivery creation VL10D
↧
Sales Distribution SD Module User Exit - Past Due Credit
Hi
Would like to consult on weather it is possible to ask a SAP developer to develop user exit for Credit Block to ignore, and let the Sales Order go to billing if:
1. If risk category: N01 (we set it up as low risk customer) and past due not more than $5,000 (including a credit where a customer has not taken for longer than certain days, and therefore triggers Past DUE)
2. All risk category with past due not more than $5000, regardless hwoever many days it has been past due.
Our situation here is big distributors take their own sweet time to take their chargebacks. We have only 4 big distributors, and we don't want to hold any of their orders, and tired of releasing orders that are not really triggered by "past due".
thank you
↧
↧
Re: KI 100 Error on VF02 Release to Accounting
Hi all,
Our financial consultant temporarily resolved the issue by deactivating the cross company check.
I do have an issue in the last step of generating the interco billing document but I will raise a separate message for this.
Regards
SF
↧
RVIVAUFT: Cannot generate intercompany billing document
Hi all,
I am currently testing a order related intercompany solution involving repair order. This is to take care of situation where the repair request is received by one company but the repair work is done by another entity/company within the organisation. See http://qsands.com/pdfs/QSandS_Order_Related_IC_Billing.pdf for more details.
The process is as follows:
1. Create a repair order (order type RAS) under company 1000
2. Assign an item with plant 3000 that belongs to company 3000
3. Create return delivery and goods receipt
4. Trigger service order creation from repair order
5. Update plan cost and post actual on service order
6. Run DP90 to add sub-item for billing in repair order. The item category is IRIN. The lines added are under plant 3000 which is the key to triggering the output RDIV when the customer billing document is created (not interoco).
7. Technically close service order
8. Create outbound delivery document and goods issue.
9. When I run VF01 to create the billing document, the document is created successfully. RDIV is shown in the output screen. However, it failed when I tried to process it via VF31.
The problem is there is no processing log shown and the same applies when I tried to run the program RVIVAUFT directly. Does anyone encounter similar problem before? Just wondering what could possibly be missing in this case that stops the creation of the interco document?
I looked in SDN and SAP but could not find anything useful.
Appreciate any advice on the above.
Regards
SF
↧
Re: Sales Distribution SD Module User Exit - Past Due Credit
Isn't this possible with OVA8 routines?
The only difficult part is, that you don't wish t use percentages, but a hard amount.
Our situation here is big distributors take their own sweet time to take their chargebacks. We have only 4 big distributors, and we don't want to hold any of their orders, and tired of releasing orders that are not really triggered by "past due"
I am confused. Aren't these charge-backs items in BSID for these KUNNR with SHKZG eq 'H'?
In standard SAP, I think ,such items are not considered for overdue checks - check LF035F00.
↧
↧
Re: Issue with discount c.type at sales order
↧
Re: Issue with discount c.type at sales order
Hi,
As shown in second screenshot, customer/material record is ignored in Prd. Client. So k007 discount is not taken into account. And zp01 is determined as per fourth screenshot
Third screenshot is correct which needs to come and is coming with test system . But not with Prd. Client.
Please assist as issue is not with test system but with Prd client.
Thanks and Regards,
Sachin K
↧
Re: Issue with discount c.type at sales order
please check and assist
↧
Re: Issue with discount c.type at sales order
The comparison screen shot shows for a different condition type ZP01. You need to share the screen shot where the value is coming for K007. Moreover, the error message shared on the first screen shot (Condition ignored.....) is a standard error message. Did you check with your technical team as to why system is not considering a particular Division when it is considering the other one?
G. Lakshmipathi
↧
↧
Re: Issue with discount c.type at sales order
Hi,
If its is coming correctly in test system but not in PRD, then there is some issue with master data only.
The only thing you can do is analyze the same more carefully in PRD and fix it or else replicate the same case in DEV or test system to analyze better.
Thanks.
Sumeet
↧
Re: Sales Distribution SD Module User Exit - Past Due Credit
Veselina,
that is what i have been told. Im a user and i will submit this to our SAP in-house bus.analyst.
I will check your recomendation: OVA8 and LF035F00
This is an attempt for a "2nd" opinion and holding our SAP in-house team accountable. So thanks for your answer.
On the last comment, i have access to SQVI and therefore would be able to check those value. Without going to tables, can i check on FBL5N?
last but not least, i know on VKM1 when releasing i can see the reason a particular Sales Order is being held for. Dyna Mavo OlIt, when it is A A B, i know it is being held due to Past Due (Oldest Items).
How/where do i found out, as a normal user, what has been set in each risk category to trigger past due?
↧
Re: Sales Distribution SD Module User Exit - Past Due Credit
Hello Yan,
if you need to get a second opinion and ideas on technical realization before you have even spoken to your consultants, then there is something wrong with the procedures and the working atmosphere in your company.
Checking customizing (OVA8) or reading code (LF035F00) is not how as a business user you can contribute best, if you wish to develop in such direction, maybe you can apply for a position in your SAP department.
It is a bad idea to base your opinions on your in-house experts from a post in an internet forum from a random person who has no access to your configuration, developments etc.
If one of my users needs to know specific configuration details, all he has to do is ask, and I would send him the data and explain the setup. Maybe you can also ask your consultant to provide you the information.
The authorization team has been really generous to grant you SQVI. Yes, there is a way to check lots of things with it, but there is a reason why you have no OVA8 display access, so giving you ideas how to bypass restrictions and check configuration will be irresponsible.
As to SHKZG - this one you can see in user transactions, it is the debit/credit indicator.
↧
Wrong VAT calculation
Hello colleagues,
We are faced with this case. We have two items in sales order. Both items have same value 0,83EUR, but the VAT is calculated for the first item as 0,17EUR and 0,16EUR for second item.
It is on the printout it is also stated net price and VAT per item and it is illogical, that for the same price we have different VAT amounts. Could you please help me why this is happening and how to get proper VAT per item?
Thank you,
Harry
↧
↧
Re: Wrong VAT calculation
Hi,
Could you please check the combination on condition tab on which VAT is getting determined per item in sales order. It could be due to two condition record record maintained material wise.
Please check and if not resolved then please share the screen shot of the pricing screen along with two item details pricing.
Thanks.
Sumeet
↧
Re: Sales Distribution SD Module User Exit - Past Due Credit
Thank you for your advise and opinion.
I see where you coming from especially as an SAP developer dealing with business user like me who trying to be a "smart-***" 
by using the word "2nd opinion" "holding our SAP team accountable"
I assure you that is not my attention. I am just trying to do with limited IT resources we have, tickets are backlogged and I have to gain understanding faster than the projected time they have allocated for our dept. When it comes to our time, I can speak some of the "language" and perhaps they can understand it right away. That is all.
Also although I have a curious mind, in no way I have the knack to go/or develop skills in this direction, this is just an attempt to help the team here. I do read and compare, and make judgment as to which advise/opinion from a "random person" (you are not random by your historical posts and/or badges btw - you're an expert) to take in.
Back to OVA8, apparently I do have view access. "no modification"
And I can see each Risk Category has CG 01 and CG 02 with some details in it. I can see now what triggers past due for each risk category.
Your first comment was % was not a good idea, but I see theres Max.open.item%. With credit Limit 1M, would putting 1% ignore all past due items up to $10,000?
Where in OVA8 can a setup for specific amount be set?
↧
Re: Sales Distribution SD Module User Exit - Past Due Credit
Hello Yan,
my intention was not to scold you, it is great that you are trying to help.
The problem with getting an opinion from people in SCN is that we have no access to check the setup in your system or be aware how a certain solution would impact the business processes in your company.
People who usually seek advise here, can check the customizing and can obtain documentation of the company-specific developments, read the code, access SAP notes etc. With your current role this can be challenging.
It can happen that my idea is not suitable, because it conflicts with a certain setup and your SAP team would probably choose a different approach that takes more time to implement and test. So if the consultant tells you that something is really complicated and will take a lot of time and effort to implement, it is possible that he has some reasons - you can ask him to explain you how they are planning to implement the change and what will be the impact on other processes.
Maybe you can ask the SAP team if they need help with preparing good examples in a test system or with testing the solution - this could speed up the process.
As to my comment on percentages - I meant it is usually better and easier to use percentages instead of hard amounts. The check on open items is not directly related to credit limit - open items are the documents you see in FBL5N. There you can have normal items and also some items with special G/L indicator taken into account.
Imagine you have customer A with open items for 10 000 and from these 1 500 are overdue for more than 5 days. You have in OVA8 setting for 5 days and 10 %. This means that the next order will be blocked because of overdue items. If your setting is 5 days and 20 %, then it will not be blocked.
If you have 0 days for overdue and you have 10 000 total, out of which 1500 are overdue for 5+days and 200 are overdue with 1 day, then the check will be done against 1 700 and not against 1 500 as in the first example.
For most of your customers you wish to have zero days tolerance (all overdue items should be considered in the check) and only for low risk ones you will consider overdue items after X days of being overdue. If what I explained about percentages and days is sufficient for your processes, then probably it will be mostly configuration effort and testing. If you really need a check against hard amounts, then this involves also development, because such setting does not exist in standard.
If you go for development in credit management, please make sure that you and your colleagues test all possible scenarios end-to-end before it gets to your production environment.
↧
Re: Wrong VAT calculation
Hi Sumeet,
It is the same condition record.
also please find attached screens:
Thank you,
Harry
↧
↧
Re: Wrong VAT calculation
Hi,
check the pricing analysis and also the material Tax classifications visible in the sales order
↧
Re: Wrong VAT calculation
Hi,
Tax classification is same for both items and analysis show completely the same data. In fact before saving it, SAP shows same tax amount 0,17 but after saving for the second item for tax amount is changed to 0,16.
Regards,
Harry
↧
Re: Wrong VAT calculation
Hi,
If you see:
For Line Item 10:
PB00 is 89,00 per 100 PC
For Line Item 20:
PB00 is 00,89 per 1 PC
This for what reason?
Thanks.
Sumeet
↧