Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP SD Billing
Viewing all 6807 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

rebate agreement not displaying past sales (invoices)

January 29, 2016, 6:05 am
$
0
0

Dear Gurus,

 

I am facing one issue where in the sales invoices were created from 1st January 2016 but the rebate agreement was created on 28th of January valid for the year.

 

The system is considering only the invoices created on 27th and later.

 

I know the accruals will not be calculated for the past sales, I want the system to show the past sales (invoices), so that we can see the amount that we have to accrue manually in the system. This is a rebate agreement for product hierarchy.

 

That’s the way it works with the other types of agreements type. 

 

What could be the reason for this behaviour of the system?

 

Anyone Please guide me in this.

 

Thanks & Best Regards

↧
Search

Re: rebate agreement not displaying past sales (invoices)

January 29, 2016, 6:47 am
$
0
0

Dear Gurus,

 

One thing I came to know just now that, the Transport requests for this new agreement type were moved to PRD on the 27th of January 2016, and the Rebate Agreement was created in the PRD system on 28th.

 

In the verification level of this new Rebate Agreement, the system is displaying invoices created on 27th with Accruals value as zero though and for the invoices created after 27th January, it is displaying all the values correctly. But the system has not considered the invoices created from the 1st of January to 26th of January.

 

Want to know from you experts whether the TR movement could play a role in this case?

 

I mean to say it has considered the invoices created from the date of TR movement but has skipped the invoices created prior to that.

 

Please guide me..

 

Thanks & Best Regards

↧
↧

Re: Bulk Item selection option in VK11

January 31, 2016, 9:52 pm
$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

Appreciate your help. Please guide me.

 

Many thanks in advance.

↧

Re: rebate agreement not displaying past sales (invoices)

January 31, 2016, 10:28 pm
$
0
0

Hi Lucas,

 

I don't know if below document and info will help you.

 

If you want to do retro rebate for billing in the past then you may refer to this:- https://scn.sap.com/thread/1282018

 

While this is the info relate to rebate

 

75778 - Consulting/troubleshooting for rebate processing

 

410579 - FAQ: Rebate processing Hope this will help you. Many thanks.

↧

Re: Billing job is Skipping few Deliveries

February 1, 2016, 1:56 am
$
0
0

Hi,

please check the billing date of your order and the settings of the Job.

Maybe the billing date is set to (one) day ahead and Job is only selecting deliveries with billing date equals actual date.

Another thing is you can check VKDFS table and if entry is not there you can try regenerate the entries via report RVV05IVB.

 

BR

Robert

↧
↧

Invoice Number -Reset Every year

February 1, 2016, 2:26 am
$
0
0

Hi,

My client wants the invoice number  to be reset every Financial Year.

I believe it is not possibility.

 

Please suggest me,if it can be done.

↧

Re: Invoice Number -Reset Every year

February 1, 2016, 3:29 am
↧

Re: Invoice Number -Reset Every year

February 1, 2016, 6:07 am
$
0
0

As like FI number range where SAP has provided year as one of the input parameters, to maintain the number range, you don't have such an option for SD documents.  You can very well explain this to your client and tell them it is not possible to have year-wise billing document.

 

 

G. Lakshmipathi

↧
Search

Re: Invoice Number -Reset Every year

February 1, 2016, 6:09 am
$
0
0

hello,

 

you can restart invoice number from one every finance year

↧
↧

VF01 The bill-to party could not be determined

February 1, 2016, 7:00 am
$
0
0

Hi everyone, We're upgrading from SP11 to SP17, and performing some tests in our QA environment, we've found this errors when trying to create a billing

document in VF01:

 

The bill-to party could not be determined

The payer could not be determined

 

This issues wasn't there before the upgrade,

 

Thanks for any help.

↧

Re: VF01 The bill-to party could not be determined

February 1, 2016, 7:45 am
$
0
0

Are those partner functions there in sale order?

 

 

G. Lakshmipathi

↧

How to send invoice outputs to Ship-to party?

February 1, 2016, 3:25 pm
$
0
0

Hello Gurus,

 

My client is currently sending invoice outputs to customers (Sold-to parties) via email but for a specific customer they want to send it to Ship-to parties. Any ideas on the subject requirement would be highly appreciated.

 

Thank you,

Aakaash

↧

incorrect tax c.type pick up from customer master record while determining tax in sales order

February 2, 2016, 4:35 am
$
0
0

Hi

 

i have correct tax customer classification in customer as well in material. correct c.record maintained..still it picks up different c.record so incorrect tax code.still incorrect combination pickup shown in analysis in sales order.Please suggest urgent

 

Tax.jpgtax2.jpg

tax3.jpg

 

Br

Sachin

↧
↧

Re: incorrect tax c.type pick up from customer master record while determining tax in sales order

February 2, 2016, 5:58 am
$
0
0

The sale order analysis screen shot shows, system has considered the combination of Country ES, Customer Tax Classification as 1 and Material Tax Classification as 3.

 

I am not sure on the other two screen shots since it does not show the customer code and material code for which, the sale order has been created.  So you need to check once again

 

 

G. Lakshmipathi

↧

Re: Data in Material for Settlement

February 2, 2016, 6:22 am
$
0
0

As long as you create Material Rebate Agreement (Agreement type 0002) and maintain condition record, system will consider those materials for rebate settlement.  Of course, in order system to consider for rebate, you need to maintain tax relevant data in sales view and standard Accounting views for correct FI posting. 

 

 

G. Lakshmipathi

↧
Search

Re: Data in Material for Settlement

February 2, 2016, 7:24 am
↧

Re: incorrect tax c.type pick up from customer master record while determining tax in sales order

February 2, 2016, 7:51 am
$
0
0

yes i checked with customer code and material code for which sales order created. its 0 , 3.

 

howver it is picking customer tax classification 1 in analysis of sales order which is incorrect.

↧
↧

Re: incorrect tax c.type pick up from customer master record while determining tax in sales order

February 2, 2016, 8:12 am
$
0
0

Hi Sachin ,

 

Did you change customer master after creating order , if so then you need to create a new order .

If still issue persist , check the customer master sales area , whether are you looking at the correct sales area of the customer .

 

 

thanks and regards,

Rajesh

↧

Re: Data in Material for Settlement

February 2, 2016, 8:30 am
$
0
0

Hi Jakob ,

 

Basically material for settlement will be used when you are trying to settle the rebate agreement , this material will be used when credit memo is created during settling the rebate agreement .

This material is not used for condition record maintenance .

Please correct me if i am wrong .

 

 

thanks ,

Rajeshwar.

↧

Re: incorrect tax c.type pick up from customer master record while determining tax in sales order

February 2, 2016, 9:35 am
$
0
0

I guess the business wishes that the problem with this specific document is fixed ASAP and would be OK to continue the investigation after you provide them with some temporary solution.

 

If the business users have confirmed that in the order they have used the correct partner functions and the tax classification is incorrect, try to set the alternative tax classification in the sales order header, billing tab to 0 and check if this would result in a correct determination.

 

Of course, if you have issued some proformas and printed/sent the info to the end customer, you will have to resend it.

 

If you have created final billing document with FI posting, then, depending on the country legislation and posting period, you can either cancel/create new billing after changing the alternative tax classification, or create invoice correction/credit/debit memo.

 

This could buy you some time to investigate changes to partner functions/tax classification indicators in the master data, manually entered partners, custom developments and so on.

↧
Viewing all 6807 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>