Hi Sahil,
If you have created a SO of Qty 10, so, its not necessary that you have to create only one Delivery and Invoice against that SO. You can create multiple no of Delivery against that SO and based on those Delivery , create the Sales Invoices.
Regards
Ocean
Hi Lakshmipathi,
1) but I have created first delivery for quantity 5; how to invoice customer for this 5 quantity while creating invoice only from SO.
2) I have plans to create second delivery for left 5 quantities and would like to create second invoice for this second delivery. how to mention remaining
quantity in invoice is there anyway system can recognize remaining quantities to be delivered.
correct that it should not be possible to create invoice from SO,
my intention was to know the relevant field which convey system which quantity to be used in invoice which is 'billing relevance' in item category.
coming to second point i would like to ask is it possible if i can create two delivery for one line item of SO and later invoice them as 1 invoice.
if possible my question here is how system will recognize in second delivery what is the remaining quantity.
Hi Ram,
There is 2 option:
1. Go to tcode VTFL choose your billing type and source delivery type then go to item level choose your item category and change Data VBRK/VBRP on 003. But this will affect on foreground behaviour too.
2. You can create variant in VF04 transaction and create a background job in SM36.
Regards,
Maria
my question is :
if possible how system will recognize in second delivery what is the remaining quantity.
Hi Sahil,
How you are creating the Delivery document?
And How you are linking the Sales Order to Delivery Document?
If you will copy the Delivery from Sales Order, the it will automatically calculate the Qty.
Regards
Ocean
Hi,
In the copy control from Delivery to billing for your item category maintain the requirement Single Invoice 003 in DATA VBRK/VBRP
and set up the job using the program SDBILLDL in SM35
regards,
santosh
Hi
In my opinion it sounds to a question related with FI summarizing. Please, see SAP Note 36353 - AC interface: Summarizing FI documents and revert if it's useful.
Check also SAP Note 310837 - Simulation for document summarization in FI for an analysis step.
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo
Hello,
if in transaction VTFA you set Billing quantity 'B' - Delivery quantity less invoiced quantity then system it will bill quantity 5 after first delivery, and will bill again quantity 5 after second delivery.
But if you run VF01 before to create the first delivery (or after first invoice), the system will create billing document with quantity zero.
Maybe you could create your own copy routine to check the quantity.
Best regards,
Ivano.
Hi Sahil,
With all the comments and what you pointed out, I just want to know what difficulty you are facing in your SD process which I perceived mentioned below;
Step - 1 - Create SO with qty = 10 EA (SO No 1)
Step - 2 - Create Delivery qty = 5 EA (Delivery No 1 from SO 1)
Step - 3 - Create Billing qty = 5 EA (First Invoice Billing reference is Delivery)
Step - 4 - Create Delivery qt = 5 EA (Delivery No 2 from SO 1)
Step - 5 - Create Billing qty = 5 EA (Second Invoice Billing reference is Delivery)
This is standard SD process for every organization having Sales scenario.Put some more info with the exact issue you are facing in this process.
Thanks,
Suman$
In the Transport Document the value of the goods that the system brings is different from the value of the goods contained in the invoice import.
Anyone know what can be?
Hi,
For if somebody have same issue: BAPI_EXCINV_CREATE_FROMDATA
Regards,
Hi,
Check if you have activated Plants aborad functionality?
This could be the reason
regards,
santosh
Hi Pradeep Kumar,
Take the help of your ABAPer and develop a routine.
The field which splits the Invoice is ZUKRI ask your ABAPer not to split the invoice even if the Country of plants are different, Foreign trade data and Tax classification.
Hope this will work out.
Regards,
SAQ MD.
Hi Santosh,
How do I check that, can you please explain the solution. It will be very helpful.
Thanks,
Kumar
Hi Angel,
Your requirement is not so clear but still you may follow below mentioned steps:
In VI02 or VI03 you can check how system has calculated the price.
Select the line --- click on condition --- analysis
Here you can see what are the parameters set in TK11, just tally with your business you can understand what is the reason.
If you have any doubt please let me know.
Hope this will help you.
Regards
-AJC
Thanks..
will check and update for the same.
JP,
If ZPR1 to ZPR4 are not marked as statistical (in the pricing procedure), then if the value of each of these condition types do not find G/L accounts there would be Accounting Errors and creation of Accounting document would not be possible!
If you make ZPR1 to ZPR4 as statistical, and ZPRT non-statistical then it might satisfy the requirement.
But I do not know if business would like to mark ZPR1 to ZPR4 as statistical.
Dear SAP Gurus and Expert,
Currently, user wants to create Sales Order with Billing Plan. However when everything is entered the configuration Billing Plan Type to the Document type ZOPC is ZF but it is shown ZE.
Have check all the configuration setting the document type ZOPC is assigned to Billing Plan Type ZF and the itsm category in the Sale Order is ZTBB which is also assigned to Billing Plan Type ZF.
Kindly advise why the Billing Plan Type in the Document Type ZOPC is not by default defined as configuration but default by other Billing Plan Type.
Thank you
Regards
Leonard Tan
Dear Tan
We can set Billing plan type at following
An entry in the customer master has priority. so please check in the customer master record.
Regards
Srini
Hi,
Please confirm
1. do you have any value in the billing document ? if the value is 0 then print out will not generate
2. Is accounting document generated for the billing document? if not print out can be generated
3. check the output procedure in NACE and check any output routine assigned against your output type ?
revert back after finding them
regards,
santosh