Hello,
it's very strange because field WERKS is contained in table VBRP, and so it shouldn't lead to invoice splitting by default.
Are you sure that the copy control routine is the standard one? Check in the field ZUKRI of table VBRK if the plant code is filled.
Best regards,
Andrea
Hello Andrea,
thanks for your kind concern.
I am also strange knowing that why my invoices are getting split even though I am using standard routines in copy control. I have checked ZUKRI which contains a string "0010104" which is nothing but concatenation of routine # 001, distribution channel 01 and division 04.
Any clue on this ?
Hello,
I made a test on my system, with different plants at item level: I have a custom routine with two more custom fields as splitting criteria, beside SPART and VTWEG, and anyway I'm able to create a single invoice.
I guess if you have other data leading to invoice splitting (such as partner, incoterms, destination country) and the message regarding the plant could be misleading.
Best regards,
Andrea
Dear All,
Appreicate your help and advice to handle this requirement.
We have implemented the indonsian ODN functionality for issuing ( Domestic -Tax invoices -VAT serial no ).
Currently it works as below when an invoice cancellation process takes place.
for ex:
VF01- Invoice creation - 915069944 - VAT /ODN # -> 0109001455609098
VF11-Invoice cancellation-940003647 - VAT /ODN #-> 0109001455609098 ( cancellation will not consume new ODN - will be same as original invoice).
VF01 - Invoice creation - 915069945 - VAT/ODN # -> 0109001455609099 ( Revision invoice).
The problem is when a revision invoice is created, then ODN number is consuming a new ODN # for a revision invoice (55609099).
The requirement is when a revision invoice is created, we would need the same ( original ) ODN number (55609098) to be consumed and not to consume new ODN (55609099). Additionally, we also need to notify that this is a revision invoice by changing the ( STATUS CODE) to 1 from 0.
That is for the (Revision) invoice 915069945 - the expected VAT/ODN no should be assigned as - 0119001455609098.
I was checking over several notes 1033737 / 1578519 /1856053/1839112. This one 1033737 says that we may not be able to change the status code at all from 0 to 1 .
Two things:
1. How could we stop system consuming a new # (ODN) ,when a revision invoice ->( further to cancellation invoice) is created.
2. If option # 1 is possible, then how could we change the status code from 0 to 1.
Is there a standard functionality in which we could acheive this by any chance, since i couldnt find more details on this topic any where.
Else, Will it be feasible if going for an enahcement for acheiving this without disturbing any of the other ODN's. ex(Italy).
How best we could handle if we go for enhacement. We are using same SD (Invoice) and FI(Accouting) numbers as same sequence no's.
Thanks,
Best Regards,
Kumar.
Hi,,
Just check this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_fsb10/helpdata/en/1a/9cf851109b3d3ae10000000a441470/frameset.htm
As per this link flexible link is inbuilt component from EhP6
please check the link for more info
Hi Ryan,
Because of your this post, I got some knowledge on SAP SD integration with FI.
Many Thanks/ Himanshu Gupta
I want to revision number in retro billing .
so where it configure and how it work.
plz clarify whole process of revision number .
Rgds,
Meenakshi
Hi,
you can do in this way
Since you already put efforts by going through the couple of OSS notes (I appreciate this), I feel, you have to go with USEREXIT_NUMBER_RANGE in the program RV60AFZZ to achieve this requirement.
G. Lakshmipathi
I am not sure why you have used Invoice no. as tax Invoice no. (faktur No.)
SAP has given standard configuration to generate faktur no. for each invoice. Separate number range has to be maintained for the same.
Tax Invoice number is populated in the Reference field of Invoice and same is copied in Accounting document.
For changes of status code on the basis of Customer tax classification we have implemented customer exit where we change the first two digits appropriately based on Customer tax classification.
When I created a billing doc. the "Net Value" field doesn't copied the value from sales order.
Did somebody had the same issue,yet?
Thanks.
Hi Friend,
The requirement from our client is as follow: Whenever we receive the communication for cancellation of subscription....we need to stop the billing plan for revenue recognition and we need Recognize the revenue Immediately for the balance life of the billing plan Immediately.... while recognizing this revenue Current month revenue needs to post to one GL account and balance months next to current month needs to post to another GL account...
Analysis from my end.... we need to develop a new condition type to calculate the total revenue of balance months next to current month and one more view point from my end whenever we receive info for cancellation of subscription billing plan end date may be the cancellation date that is with in the current month, so we can recognize total revenue immediately
So could you help me in this how to do it.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Kundan
Hello Juan,
Request you to please share the following details
1) Is the IDCP transaction not printing billing documents ?
2) Which Country are you using IDCP for ?
3) Please share screenshots of the Configuration where Assignment is done of Document Class to Document Type.
Regards
Sameer Shinghal
Hi,
In accounting document item level there will be a field sales order,what are the system setting need to configure to populate sales order value in sales order field of account document.
Thanks & Regards
Giridhar
Hi Bhaskar,
You mean sales order number ?
By default it will Copy sales order number , there is no specific code for it
Is it not getting copied Automatically ?
please share screenshot with line item
regards,
santosh
I have configure the rebate agreement and it call the value successfully at the time of invoice, but have some query regarding its a accounting entry.
Lets say invoice value is $100 Net, $17 Tax, and system calculate the provision $10 ref. to rebate agreement.
1. What accounting entry is done at the time of Invoice overall or rebate specific. ?
(I suggest its A/R Dr $117, Sale Cr $100, Tax Cr $17, Provision a/c take the value of $10, but confuse in it, what is the value) please suggest the overall entry.
2. What accounting entry done if I create the credit memo for the provision value of $10. ?
Rebate Expense Dr $10
Rebate Payable Cr $ 10
3. What accounting entry is done at the time of payment. ?
Rebate Payable Dr $10
Cash Cr $10
Looking for the gurus response, confuse in the invoice entry, is it a single entry for provision, what kind of account should we use, etc..
Looking for the gurus feedback.
Regards,
Hi Eliano,
See Tx. VTFA and item (for e.g TAN) check "Pricing type".
G: Copy pricing elements unchanged and redetermine taxes. The system
Regards,
H.Terras
Hi Bhaskar,
Just i debugged the Program and Found that the value of Sales order is getting Updated Only when your PGI document has no Account Document
For example, this will be the scenario where your valuation happens at Sales order line item
Here, i don't want to confuse by bringing Costing terminology so i am restricting myself with giving one direct Configuration where you can find the difference
Just check the sales Order Procurement Indicator and see the Requirement Type, and identify corresponding requirement class
If Requirement class has Account assignment as M and Valuation as M then Accounting document will be populated with the sales order number at line item, and RA, Settlement should be updated
This is the standard Code
you can check by Comparing with some other requirement class which has above two settings
I have noticed these difference in my production system and behavior is exactly what i explained before
Hope it helps you
revert with your findings as well, so that it would be helpful for forum also
thanks
santosh
Hello,
the field VBRK-BUPLA is determined inside function ID_SD_FILL_BUPLA_COUNTRY.
It is filled only for psecific countries (Thailand, Taiwan, Korea etc.).
I suppose this is required for local legal requirement, so I'm afraid you cannot avoid the split.
Best regards,
Ivano.