Hi Anand,
I used a 100% copy condition ZFGS that copies value from PR00.(Please check the attached image).
I have not used JASS. Can you please share me the condition type JASS's image so that I can verify as I don't have JASS in my system.
Thanks
Phani Prasad
Dear Phani
I have checked your suggestion of exclusion condition and it works exactly the way you have described and resolves the problem .
I would like to go one step further and create Incompletion log if two prices are entered so that it makes you correct the order and hence correct billing takes place.
Regards
Ramanathan
hi sir,
you said subtotal of all the discounts can be included in the pricing of a sales order.
can you elaborate on this ? i have two discounts in my pricing procedure ha00 and skt0 and i have assigned subtotal type 4 to skto but i dont see any subtotal calculation reflecting in my sales order? kindly help me on this issue.
hi,
i tested it as your comments but it is taking duplication billing.
thanks
Md. Enayet hossain
Hi Prathisbha,
Good day. Please check if the following notes are able to help you.
410579 FAQ: Rebate processing
114756 Customer hierarchy determination for pricing
75778 Consulting/troubleshooting for rebate processin
I tested the following steps:
--------------------------------------
1,Create Hierarchy Node - VD01
2.Create Customer Hierarchy - VDH1N. Connect customer master records
3.Create Rebate Agreement - VBO1
4.updated using SDBONT06 report - VBOF
I tested the above and the following passage from note 75778 is correct
h) Hierarchy rebate
In Sales and Distribution, it is possible to define a rebate so
that payment is made on the basis of sales volumes of customer
hierarchies.
Maintain the customer hierarchy nodes (maintenance using TA VDH1)
as customers. These must then be indicated as being relevant for
rebate.
IMPORTANT: If you need to make changes concerning relevance to
rebate in the customer master, after you complete the changes,
you must branch to maintenance of the customer hierarchy to
update it and include this change.
In accordance with the Customizing settings for partner
determination, the system determines the hierarchy nodes at a
higher level than the customer in the corresponding documents.
These are then available for pricing or for rebate processing
(fields: HIEBOxx).
IMPORTANT: Since no new partner determination is subequently
possible for documents, these cannot be updated. That is, changes
to the customer hierarchy no longer affect partners in existing
documents and therefore no longer affect existing sales volumes
within a rebate arrangement.
The thing is when a hierarchy is detected the heirarchy partner is
written into table XVBPA in the sales document, then it becomes
available to pricing.
SDBONT06 does a new pricing with pricing type 'I' but in the case of
subsequent invoices the partner function of the hierarchy is missing in
the document so the heirarchy field used by pricing is not filled and
the condition not found.
It might be possible for you to use the pricing user exits in RV60AFZZ
to fill the heirarchy partner in which case SDBONT06 might be able to do
the update.
I hope the above information is able to clarify the standard system
behaviour to you.
Thanks,
Best Regards;
Lohyh
You can't assign many CCA to one company code
As
one to one relation between CCA (Credit Control Area) to company code.
You can assign different sales area to one CCA
I’ve been entering returns today & keep getting the pop up message that the documents that I’m creating today are only valid until 6/3. The requested delivery is 6/1 and cancel is 7/15. I want to make sure that these documents do not expire for any reason.
Hi
This message is a warning message. Please, let us know the technical name of the message.
Regards
Eduardo
I’ve been entering returns today & keep getting the pop up message that the documents that I’m creating today are only valid until 6/3.
The warning message does not read as valid until but it reads as Valid-from. So double click on the message and check the message details.
Since this is only a warning message, it looks it will not impact any of your requirements.
Regards,
I never worked on self-billing, hence not sure on the tables. However, per OSS Note 1590755 - FAQ: Various self-billing procedures in SD (point 2) it looks self billing without EDI is not possible.
Few more OSS notes on this topic are Note 1605859 - FAQ: Processing step in SD self-billing procedure , Note 1318079 - FAQ: How to use SD self-billing
Regards,
Dear
Generally in enterprise structure we can assign only one company code to one cca
but in OBZK IT is possible we can assign default credit control ares to one company code
getting the pop up message that the documents that I’m creating today are only valid until 6/3
Seems to be a customized message and not a standard message. Please check the error message number and if it starts with Z, then you have to check with your ABAPer. On the other hand, if it starts with other than Z, please update here what that message number is.
G. Lakshmipathi
Hi
Please check in copy control routines from subsequent document to sale return or check in MV45AFZZ program. This message seems customized and its logic can be in program MV45AFZZ.
Thank$
Hi,
We want to disable a conditon type in billing document.
Code has been written in the conditon calculation routine to clear the values of xkomv-kwert, xkomv-kbetr, xkwert.
Which is working fine for the sales document, however when it goes to billing the values in condition types are redermined again.
How to stop the system from determining the values of the conditons in billing?
Thanks!
Hi Amlan,
Go to VTFL of your Del to billing and click on Item ( here go to your Item category) Check what is the Price Type you have there...
You should have either "D" or "G" so that condition type will not be redermined in billing.
Hope this is what your requirement.
Regards, Sai Krishna.
Blanca,
I would like to exclude an item category YPXX from intercompany invoicing, as it is only customer . relevant.
The "cleanest" solution could be to create a dedicated Sales document type for the Intercompany Sale process (in other words for both F2 and IV; user shall create a sales order with a different order type).
For this order type, the item category YPXX is not "applicable" or assigned (in VOV4).
Thus user can not create intercompany sales order with item category YPXX.
If you want to keep the same Sales document type, for OTC sale and for Intercompany sales; and do not want to use item category YPXX for intercompany sales, then probably coding / enhancement needs to be done.
In program MV45AFZB, in userexit USEREXIT_CHECK_VBAP, lines of code have to be written where the logic would be -
check the Company code of the sales organization with the Company code of the delivering plant,
- if same then allow item category YPXX;
- if different then do not allow item category YPXX;
in the sales order.
Hello.
Can someone please help me understand the SAP errors I am experiencing? In VFX3 I am attempting to release a billing document to accounting but it has a pricing error (VF073). This error is also preventing me from executing VF01. I've checked the costing values and believe they are to be correct for the one material item listed on the purchase order. Can you please help me identify other areas that can be creating this problem? Please see the attached screen shots.
For pricing error VF073, check in the billing document, pricing has been maintained or not. It looks the pricing condition is set as mandatory in the pricing procedure, but no pricing value has been maintained in the document (also check pricing master record has been maintained in t.code VK11/VK12 or not). If the pricing is there, then you may need to refer OSS 1625158 - Error messages VF073 and V1208.
For VF017 error message, check the document flow of the delivery, whether already the invoice has been created. If not then check whether OSS Note 728514 - Cross Company: Delivery is proposed again is of any help to you.
Regards,
Hi,
We are trying to configure bill of direcot functioality e-mail notification via output type FIN1 witih requirement 406. However, once we have this requirement 406, it seems conidtion type FIN1 is not getting determined in the output determination procedure of the billing document. I have gone thru' the output determination analysis and FIN1 is missing here.
If I put back normail requirement 62, FIN1 is getting determined however it is getting incorrectly processed.
Your early response in this regard will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards.
Hi,
This is something you have to check with your ABAPer in Debugging mode
regards,
santosh