Mario,
What are company A and B in SAP? are these company codes?
When goods are sent from a plant of one company code to a plant of the another, then it is a sale and company code B must pay for the goods.
Please explain why it should not pay? And why invoice need not be sent to it?
TW
Hi,
We have achieved this by user exit at delivery level, the status of the billing relevance has been changed thru user exit to relevant for billing at delivery document level. It (delivery) was not relevant for billing before since the item category config is relevant for order related billing.
So, now we are able to do the rental billings from order rental billing plan data and after end of the rental contract say one year later able to do the actual deliver, shipment and invoice from same sales order.
Regards,
Lakshmikanth.
Currently how you are maintaining segment in sap..are you trying with division?
Normally standard system will split the invoices based on division used..
Phanikumar
Hi SRK,
Thanks for providing the link for realization of invoicing partially for Batch split items. That worked!!
Best Regards!!
Thanks Lakshmipathi for your advice.
Best Regards!
If I understood you correctly, the receiving company is a separate legal entity, so sales between the two them in general would not violate the local regulations. Of course, you cannot sell at unrealistically low prices and transferring of free products will be always checked carefully, but this a completely different problem.
Just because you create a billing document, this does not mean that you will create a customer open item.
You mention marketing samples. For sure the people in charge of the marketing campaign/promotions planning wish to track where the products went, how much they have spent on that initiative, etc.
This means that you probably have a WBS element to track each campaign/promotion. You can use discounts for billing and still achieve the required traceability with this WBS, the other company does not pay, this can go to a different account (FI department can tell you which one is appropriate).
In some countries you pay additional taxes for giving away products with 100% discount, so you need to agree with the other company who pays for that, it could be the sending or the receiving party, not a problem.
If the receiving party is not a separate legal entity, this would be just a stock transfer between plants, so you would not have even asked the question in the SD forum. 
Edit:
To avoid potential misunderstanding - posting to a specific g/l account instead of generating a customer open item is not the same as invoicing yourself and, from what I know, is not illegal - check with your legal consultant and with the Finance department.
You would post in the same or in a similar way when you send samples to a non-affiliated company.
Message was edited by: Veselina Peykova
Hi,
I have a problem about changing price on sales order.
I have created a return sales order (without reference), PGR and billed. Before creating accounting document, I get reversal of invoice and try to change price in sales order but conditions tab is closed and can't change prices.
I can't cancel PGR but it already didn't relate to it.
Thanks,
Oktay
Dear Gurus,
I am crating a export order and entering two line items.
when I go to individual line item i seen that at billing document tab page of line item " Invoicing data" field is blank bu on the second line item invoicing data calling a value.
I am just confuse, that if both material are for selling and almost same characteristics, than why here is two different behavior, from where this value is coming on the line item.
thanks. looking for the gurus feedback.
regards,
Hi,
Share Screen shot.
Regards,
SRK
In case company A & B are using the same company code, it could be intra-company STO, there will be no invoice. This is easy for your requirement.
Whereas, if they are using different company codes, you could just use a FOC order, in which the cost of material will be posted to profit center, and no invoice is required.
Order type and item category are the keys for billing-relevant. Select the correct process according to your actual demand.
Imran, what do you mean by almost same characteristics that means both materials are different and there's some difference among them which you need to check on. Are you following proper export scenario, if yes can you please share your copy control settings? What's the different for invoice data line item wise? Billing Qty is zero, price is not appearing or what? If you could please explain the query in more detail, it would be great. Looking forward to your reply. Thanks.
Oktay, what do you mean by before creating accounting document you've reversed the invoice, how come this is possible unless or until posting block is active for your billing document and it didn't released to accounting. Can you please check the document flow to see as if really accounting document has not be created. Share the screenshots if possible so that the issue can be diagnosed accordingly. Thanks.
Imran Khan How about SCAT, SECATT, LSMW, SHDB, SM35? Rest if you would be more specific about bulk changes you wanna to make and related to what i can help you in a better way then. Thanks.
I did it in Q system with same scenario but it doesn't work.
I meant post block of accounting document.
hello
professionals
here
our client requirement is like there are some particular materials to do billing with reference of that materials but for all the material qty is different so
is it possible to do automatic based that material reference
kindly as i know that if qty is same or cumulated it possible to do
regards
viswa
Let me understand your requirement, you want to the bill the material A based on the other material B which is reference to materiel A.
if this is your requirement you can maintain price reference material in the material master.
If your requirement is different than this please revert.
Regards,
Radheshyam
Please go through this
Asking Good Questions in the SCN Discussion Spaces will help you get Good Answers
and rephrase your requirement
G. Lakshmipathi
Oktay, i think there's some kind of communication problem at our end. I didn't meant you to check it by doing posting block for your billing document type because you said that before creating accounting document you reversed the invoice so i just told you with that perspective as if accounting document hasn't been generated then there might be a posting block set for your return document type in VOFA (just an assumption).
Now coming to your issue go to VF02, give your billing document number click highlighted green flag and see what message you're getting is that the same mentioned in screen shot or different one? I'm afraid that accounting document has been generated against your billing document which has been overlooked.
If this isn't the case and you're 200% sure that accounting document hasn't been generated for your billing document and after reversing the invoice still condition tab is non-editable then check as if any enhancement has been made to set it in grey mode? I'm sure that there must be something which you've failed to notice out. Feel free to ask in case you need any help on this. Thanks.
