Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP SD Billing
Viewing all 6807 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Re: Billing Header Text Variable

February 10, 2014, 1:01 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

We have generated a standard text object by transaction SO10:

pic1.png

 

We linked one of the biling header text to this SO10 standart text object and we can see this text object when a new billing document is generated.

But, we have faced the following problems:

 

Problem 1: Variable values are not seen in VF03 header text :

pic2.png

 

1-How to show variables in VF02 or VF03 transactions?

 

Problem 2: Original variable valures are transferred to IDOC(WE02 transaction records):

pic3.png


How to see the values instead of variables in IDOC text?

 

Kind Regards,

Hamza

↧
Search

Re: Commission Agent Commission

February 10, 2014, 4:46 am
$
0
0

There is no standard functionality to cater the requirement for settling to Commission Agent in R/3.  But if your client implement ICM which is a separate server integrated with CRM, it will address all your client's requirements.

 

 

G. Lakshmipathi

↧
↧

Re: EU Triangulation Deal

February 10, 2014, 9:26 am
$
0
0

Hi Praveen,

 

Have you been able to solve this?

We are currently having the same issue and think about possible solutions.

 

Regards

Matthias

↧

Re: Invoice splitting - Account assignment group

February 11, 2014, 2:08 am
$
0
0

Hello,

please check the account group field in referred sales documents. Probably it is different there.

Best regards,

Ivano.

↧

rebate agreement type

February 11, 2014, 2:17 am
$
0
0

Respected Experts,

 

 

We have a scenario to configure rebate agreement,

 

 

customer will pay certain amount for certain period on that company will give percentage of discount,

also criteria is that certain products will be exclude:

 

Example: ABC pvt ltd. has given Rs. 20,00,000 on 20.12.2013 and participated for rebate scheme,


and given order of Product A- Rs.500000, B- Rs.100000 and C- 500000



company rule for rebate:

1. purchase date should be 20.12.2013 to 31.03.2014

2. product C will be exclude

3. 20/12/13 - 10/01/14   above 20,00,000 Rs.  will get 13.5 %,  above 10,00,000 Rs.  will get 13.00 %

    11/01/14 - 31/01/14   above 20,00,000 Rs.  will get 12.25 %   above 10,00,000 Rs.  will get 11.75 %

    01/02/14 – 20/02/14   above 20,00,000 Rs.  will get-  11.0 %, above 10,00,000 Rs.  will get 10.50 %

     21/02/14 - 10/03/14    above 20,00,000 Rs.  will get-  9.75 %, above 10,00,000 Rs.  will get 09.25 %

     11/03/14 - 31/03/14    above 20,00,000 Rs.  will get-  9.00 %,  above 10,00,000 Rs.  will get 08.50 %

4. customer fall in above criteria will get additional discount of 1.5 %

 

 

According to the rule customer ABC pvt ltd. will get rebate for Rs. 15,00,000 only

 

which is 13 % and additional 1.5 %

 

 

Please suggest.

 

 

 

 

Thanks,

Chirag Dave

↧
↧

Re: EU Triangulation Deal

February 11, 2014, 2:24 am
$
0
0

Hi Matthias,

 

Sorry, no solution yet designed.

Our issue is that client creates maximum SO in background, hence can't put manual check on "EU Trian Deal" in SO header.

 

We are looking for possible user exit development.

But before that I have asked user to define the EU triangulation deal in details.

As per them, EU triangulation deal depends upon ship-to & payer's VAT registration number.

 

I have asked them to fill the attached excel-sheet to define if SO comes under EU triangulation deal or not.

 

Please be in touch for possible solution.

My client also delaying the solution. :-)

 

Regards,

Praveen

↧

Rebate agreement type

February 11, 2014, 2:24 am
$
0
0

Respected Experts,

 

 

We have a scenario to configure rebate agreement,

 

 

customer will pay certain amount for certain period on that company will give percentage of discount,

also criteria is that certain products will be exclude:

 

Example:

ABC pvt ltd. has given order of Product A- Rs.500000, B- Rs.100000 and C- 500000

total Rs. 20,00,000 on 20.12.2013 and participated for rebate scheme,


 

company rule for rebate:

1. purchase date should be 20.12.2013 to 31.03.2014

2. product C will be exclude

3. Rebate percentage: 20/12/13 - 10/01/14   above 20,00,000 Rs.  will get 13.5 %,  above 10,00,000 Rs.  will get 13.00 %

4. customer fall in above criteria will get additional discount of 1.5 %

 

 

According to the rule customer ABC pvt ltd. will get rebate for Rs. 15,00,000 only

 

which is 13 % and additional 1.5 %

 

 

Please suggest which rebate agreement to use,

Group, Material, Customer, hierarchy or ind. of sales vol.

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks,

Chirag Dave

↧

Re: Rebate agreement type

February 11, 2014, 2:39 am
↧
Search

Re: Commission Agent Commission

February 11, 2014, 4:29 am
$
0
0

In this given case--this is compulsory to take the inputs from FI....

 

There are some transactions will be done at Finance level with the terms called Petty cash,Expenses without bills etc...

 

I sincerely suggest you--- not to become part in this---INVOLVE Finance team..

 

Phanikumar

↧
↧

Re: Rebate agreement type

February 11, 2014, 2:45 am
$
0
0

Thanks, Bhuvanashree

 

Here done configuration for indi. sales vol.,

 

1.copied agreement type from 0005-Indi. of sales vol.  and created Z005

2.copied condition group from 0005-Indi. of sales vol. and created Z005

3.assigned c.group 0005 to condition type zpr8 (basic price) using table 305-Customer/material with release status

4. assigned agreement type z005 to z005 condition group z005

5. put rebate condition copied from  BO06 and created ZRBT

6.Maintained access sequence for zzz6 which is copied from BO06



in VBO1 put z005 and customer ABC P ltd.


Here we stuck,

 

 

please suggest

↧

Re: New VAT law on Slovakia

February 11, 2014, 6:17 am
$
0
0

Please refer to OSS Note 1973775

↧

Re: New VAT law on Slovakia

February 11, 2014, 6:25 am
$
0
0

Hi Martin,

 

thanks for your information.

 

It is very hopeful.

 


↧

Block billing but allow PGI?

February 11, 2014, 2:12 pm
$
0
0

For international shipments going via vessel, we will pick parts for the order and place them on the shipping dock. These parts could be kept on the docks for 3-4 or more weeks awaiting a container and/or shipping instructions from the customer. During this time, the delivery is not PGI'd and the parts appear to be 'available' (on the delivery) without a PGI. We don't want to PGI because we don't want to invoice until the shipment has taken place. We can manually set the billing block to allow for the PGI, but it then becomes a manual process to remove the block so billing will take place.

 

Is anyone aware of a way to block billing based on a shipping condition or shipping location? Does anyone else have suggestions or experienced this same requirement?


Any assistance or suggestions would be appreciated.

Marla Lemon

↧
↧

Re: Invoice splitting - Account assignment group

February 12, 2014, 3:37 am
$
0
0

Dear Lakshmipathi,

 

  The account assignmnet group in customer master is 01 and in the sales document header is 08. in VKOA  V KOFI  1000  1000 aag customer 08 ac key erl  Gl ac 4000410.

 

I have checked an old contract which has been billed for same customer. the customer master ac assgnmt grp is 01 and in sales contract header aag  it is 08, where billing has taken place without splitting, we do have billing plans all billing blocks have been removed. i have checked the inco terms of line item and header level. For one line item  inco term was not same as the header which was changed to same as header inco terms.still invoice is splitting . Im still getting same error

Split due to different header data

           fieldname                                                           000000001                                        000000002

  Account assignment group  for t                          08                                                          09


Which field is this and how can i chk this 08 and 09? do i need  to debug pls help.

 

yezdevan

↧

Re: Invoice splitting - Account assignment group

February 12, 2014, 3:46 am
$
0
0

Hi Evano,

 

  The account asssignment group in reference document is same.

↧
Search

Re: Invoice splitting - Account assignment group

February 12, 2014, 3:51 am
$
0
0

Hi Phani,

 

In VTFA the VBRK/VBRP  000. Is this correct? i think it should have been 003 single invoice? Please advise.

 

yezdevan

↧

Re: Invoice splitting - Account assignment group

February 12, 2014, 3:54 am
$
0
0

hi ,

 

therehas been no log of changes in the last one year in the copy control settings of VTFA which is 000 for VBRK/VBRP

 

yezdevan

↧
↧

Re: Rebate agreement type

February 12, 2014, 4:26 am
↧

Re: Invoice splitting - Account assignment group

February 12, 2014, 5:50 am
$
0
0

yezdevan,

 

For how many sales orders are you creating this billing?

 

What is the value of AAG customer, in order(s)?

↧

Re: Block billing but allow PGI?

February 12, 2014, 6:19 am
$
0
0

Thank you all for your responses. Since we don't want to block at order type or item type, since these are utilized for both international and domestic shipments, and since we cannot block based on shipping condition or shipping location, I believe the only way to resolve our issue will be completely manual. I will look into the user exit option (thank you G. Lakshmipathi) but since the removal is still manual, I do not believe the business will approve.

 

Again, thank you all for your replies.

Best regards,

Marla

↧
Viewing all 6807 articles
Browse latest View live
Search